Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Career Development Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Career Development - Coursework Example Consequently, in order to develop high level of educational accomplishments amongst students, it is fundamental that one start by building stronger self-efficacy for the scholar early enough. Thus, self-efficacy is much imperative topic amongst the educators and psychologists as studies have established, self-efficacy to have an impact on psychological states to motivation to behavior. Individuals can be persuaded to believe and consider that they have the capabilities and skills to succeed. When an individual says something encouraging and positive to another person will help one to attain a goal The most important action plant towards self-efficacy personal development is mastery experiences; the most effectual means of developing strong sense of self-efficacy is by mastery experiences. Performing a task successfully strengthens our sense of self-efficacy. Conversely, failing to sufficiently deal with duties or confront may weaken and undermine self-efficacy. Therefore repeated carrying out of an activities in business for instance auditing, it will help in grasping all the essential details required in auditing, hence mastering of experience. The next action plan self-efficacy personal development is social modeling. With keen observation of what others performing the tasks and duties, I will be able to perform it later. Therefore, social modeling is achieved by witnessing other individuals successfully finishing a job or task. Observing individual accomplishing something by continued endeavor raises observers attitude and beliefs that they can also have the capacity to master similar activities to thrive. With social modeling, it boosts one’s self esteem to carry out the tasks that has been observed. Similarly, when the other party performing the tasks made a mistake, one can correct from the mistake observed and perform much better. The third action plan for self-efficacy

Monday, October 28, 2019

Effect of Military Deployment on the Family

Effect of Military Deployment on the Family Jennifer Anderson The Struggles of Military Deployment and the Effects It Has on their Family As a society member, people have rights, freedoms, and responsibilities. The military protects the rights and freedoms of society. It is our duty to watch out for neighbors, community members, and friends that are going through a deployment. Thousands of soldiers are deployed overseas each year in the United States. Multiple deployments for extended periods of time can cause many challenges for military personnel and their families. Deployments are an emotional experience creating feelings of fear, anxiety, happiness, loneliness, and stress. This can have a tremendous impact on the whole family system. As the service members undergo hardships on the battlefield, family members struggle with their challenges at home. Deployment can cause a breakdown in the family system, a lack of natural support and mental health issues for military personnel and their loved ones. Deployments can create an emotional rollercoaster for all family members. All family members go through different phases of emotions at various times which can cause a breakdown in the family system. Blair Paley cowrote an article in the Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review about the impact of deployment on military families. The article looked at family systems and ecological viewpoints to understand how deployment can impact the whole families well-being. Paleys (2013) study found the following: More than half of all service members are married, and there are nearly two million children in military families. In deployment, families face many challenges, including extended separation, disruption in family routine and potentially compromised parenting related to traumatic expose and subsequent mental health problems. (p. 245) In a family, if stress is affecting one person it is likely this will affect the whole family. The strain on a parents relationship affects the childs relationship with one, or both parents. If a parent is traumatized during deployment, it is likely this will jeopardize the whole familys well-being. Deployments can place a significant strain on a marriage. Spouses might have feelings of loneliness, anger, or distrust. Having limited communication with their partner can make the separation even more straining. Each spouse might have different ways of dealing with the separation. After a deployment, spouses might distance themselves due to having to do everything themselves, and the member coming home might feel the need to be close trying to make up for the time they were gone. When the couple is dealing with their relationship, they might not see the distress placed on the children (Paley, Lester, Mogil, 2013, pp. 246). Furthermore, a functioning family system is important for the w ell-being of all members and having natural support can eliminate some of the challenges that cause the family system to breakdown. Military members and their family members who dont feel socially connected or have a lack of support can have low self-esteem and social identity problems causing an overall effect of their well-being. Natural social support for military members can come from spouses, unit leaders, friends, and neighbors. The outcome of military personnel having this support is better mental health, perceived mission readiness, and satisfaction with military life (Welsh, Olson, Perkins, Travis, Ormsby, 2015, pp. 70-71). Natural social support for spouses and children can come from schools, community members, or extend family members. If not provided with the quality community and school support, military spouses and children will face continued stress and anxiety which could lead to mental health problems in the future (Russo, Fallon, 2015, p. 414). In leaving for deployment, members of the armed forces face many hardships. Spouses must take on extra responsibilities and children must learn to deal with only having one parent at home. They might also have to deal with a parent not coming home. The whole family is forced to make significant sacrifices which can affect their mental health. It is estimated that 25 percent to 40 percent of returning service members experience symptoms that suggest a need for mental health treatment (Walsh, 2014, pp. 35). Standard conditions include Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, depression, substance abuse, and mild traumatic brain injury. Military members can focus on deployment mentally if they know their families are safe and healthy. A military spouse is just as likely to display higher levels of stress, depression, sleep issues and adjustment disorders (Leroux, Hye-Chung, Dabney, Wells, Kum, 2016, pp. 1269). Children are separated from one parent and might experience feelings of grief or loss . When a parent returns re-establishing a connection with a child may cause the child to exhibit challenging behaviors. For example, children might display anger toward deployed parent. Confusion as to why the parent is leaving and withdrawal due to the parent being gone for several months. Research has also found maternal mental health might affect the childrens mental health state (Walsh et al., 2014, pp. 36). In conclusion, before, during and after deployment can have an impact on military families. Dealing with family systems breaking down, lack of natural support and mental health issues can have an influence on the well-being of every family member. We live in a world of freedom, and we owe this freedom to the military. It is our responsibility as citizens to help our enlisted neighbors when they are in need. References Leroux, T. C., Hye-Chung, K., Dabney, A., Wells, R., and Kum, H. (2016). Military Deployments and Mental Health Utilization Among Spouses of Active Duty Service Members. Military Medicine, 181(10). Paley, B., Lester, P., and MogilC. (2013). Family system and ecological perspectives on the impact of deployment on military families. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16(3) :245-265. Russo, T. J., and Fallon, M.A. (2015). Coping with Stress: Supporting the Needs of Military Families ad Their children. Early childhood education journal, 43(5) :407-416. Walsh, T.B., Dayton, C.J., Erwin, M.S., Muzik, M., Busuito, A., and Rosenblum, K.L. (2014). Fathering after Military Deployment: Parenting Challenges and Goals of Fathers of Young children. Health and Social Work, 39(1):35-44. Welsh, J., Olson, J., Perkins, D., Travis, W., and Ormsby, L. (2015). The Role of Natural Support System in the Post-deployment Adjustments of Active Duty Military Personnel. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(1/2) :69-78. doi:10.1007/s10464-015-9726-y

Friday, October 25, 2019

The Power Of One :: film essay

The movie was about a boy that wanted every one to come together to understand each other better and for them to have equal rights. P.K was a boy that was thought about many things on the people he was thought by his mother about England and by nanny about the Zulu. When P.K. was a small boy he went to a boarding school for the Afrikaans. He was treated bad he even almost got killed by Jaapie Botha. When he got out of the school he went to live with Doc a friend of his grandfather. Doc goes to jail because he failed to register when he entered the country since he was coming form Germany; P.K. went with him too, to jail. Their he learned to box he was thought by Geel piet a black prisoner that new how to box, as P.K he became more of a boxer. When he got out of jail he went to box at a gym. He went to school. One day in a boxing match P.K fell in love with a girl called Maria Maria's. Maria was Afrikaner and wasn't aloud to date a British boy. They started to go out then decided to get married but that never happened because Maria got killed. P.K. and his friend were teaching the black how to reed and right and that was illegal Maria was teaching too. The Afrikaner army came in and prohibited the school and that started a fight. Maria was running towards P.K. when one of the troops smashed a chair into Marias face and she died. P.K then left because he was searched by the Afrikaners that wanted him. So he left towards Alexandria. The troops were looking for P.K. and could not find him. The troops killed any black person they could see. Jaapie Botha found P.K and he was going to kill P.K but one of P.K.'s friends killed Jaapie Botha. They both escaped from the Afrikaners. There is a lot of south African history in this video because it shows what happen to black people and the British and how they were treated un equal to the Afrikaners. They were all different but that did not mean they had to be treated this way. They were punished by the police real hard for any little insignificant thing. It also shows how they believed that separation was the right thing when it rely wasn't.

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Effects of Agriculture Essay

The evolution of man through agriculture was expressed thoroughly by Jared Diamond in his article. The transition from a Neolithic way of living to a Paleolithic way of life had many negative effects. Having people settling down to build organized cities and companies meant there would be social inequalities. Women were usually the first targets to social inequality. Having people stay in one area and having them live together in villages created the uprising of epidemic diseases that created a widespread of death in communities. During this time growing their own food did not ensure that they would eat. Farmers that had failing crops would lead to starvation for their families. The change from nomads to farmers and agriculturists was not filled with full prosperity. Social inequalities created the basis for the organization of social classes and positions in every society. Women were the first group to experience social inequality. Women being weaker than men were always subject to doing less rigorous but more labor. While a man would be hunting for game, a woman’s responsibility would be to gather small vegetables and fruit if the man returns with no meat. A woman was expected to clean, nurture the small children, prepare a meal and in most cases hold a baby in her womb. Paleolithic lifestyle from the eyes of a woman suggests that a woman was not entirely pleased with the life she lived. A woman was forced into marriage with unknown knowledge of the man before. A woman craved loved but sometimes didn’t feel it in the relationships she was in. Woman were also forced to stay at home which limited the knowledge a woman can have given that she can’t even go outside. Social Inequality limits the progress of a society and women were a prime example. Epidemic diseases not only killed thousands of people and made populations decreased greatly, but also imbedded the fear of death into the minds of many people. And epidemic disease is a widespread of disease that’s transmitted from person to person. This epidemic will not stop until a vaccine is created. An example was the Black Death that plagued European countries from 1348 to 1350. Another example would be smallpox that devastated many countries and civilizations including Ancient Egypt and countries in Europe. After the Neolithic time period and the rise of agriculture, there was also a rise in epidemic disease. Having people live together in unsanitary areas quickly made people vulnerable to bacteria and other viruses. Having no knowledge of this, people of that time period would spread the bacteria to one another through physical contact which would get each other sick. Having large villages would result in a large percentage of people dying because they aren’t moving due to the end of their nomadic life, and are in one place. Also, having an overpopulated area would create a faster way for an entire civilization to perish. Epidemics in the Paleolithic time period contributed to the first mass deaths during that time period. Having to stop moving around and becoming farmers was a very helpful thing to many peoples’ lives, but that didn’t necessarily mean they had something to eat all the time. Farmers worked very hard on their plantations to ensure they had enough food for the next harvest and enough food to survive the harsh winter to come. The harvest would be successful and could also be the reason why entire families would die. A plantation would fail and lead to starvation for most families due to many environmental reasons. Droughts would occur to limit the water supply of crops. Starting to grow plants during the wrong season would definitely ensure a failing plantation. Insects and animals would destroy the hard work of these farmers by eating what the crops have produced, or just destroying it all together. Animals such as raccoons, wolves, or coyotes would see these plantations as an easy access to food and destroy a season’s hard work. Insects such as locusts would devour all in its path and the crops were an easy target for a large group of locusts. The life of a Paleolithic farmer could be prosperous but could be very harsh at times. There are many things that could contribute to the failure of a person that is living a life of agriculture from the Paleolithic time period. There were many limiting factors to making this an unsuccessful way to live, but social inequality, epidemic diseases, and failing crops that led to starvation stood out the most. It was harsh to live a very open life when being a woman subject to social inequality during this time. Living a filthy unsanitary lifestyle would lead to the death and the rise of epidemics to occur in many civilizations. The failing of a farmer’s crops could destroy his life for that season and ruin his family with just one thing to happen to his plantation. The effects of agriculture had not only a positive alternative of living but a heavy, negative, and devastating effect in the life of farmers of the Paleolithic time period.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Theories and Administrative Thought on Modern Day Police Departments

Various sociological theories and administrative thought shows that modern police department is a combination of a hierarchical and quasi-military bureaucracy. In accordance to the fundamental rationality of Weber's theory of bureaucracy, the modern police department is wrought with red tape and other unfortunate side-effects of bureaucratic organizations. On the other hand, as Weber suggested, many large-scale organizations, especially those linked to the government, must be bureaucratic if they are to be most effectively and rationally run. The modern police department, although it has adopted theories of modern sociologists and administrative thinkers, continues to resemble traditional hierarchical and bureaucratic systems. The modern police department resembles least Fayol's theories of management, in which red tape detracts from effectiveness and in which horizontal communication is widely practiced. At the same time, many police departments use Fayol's theories of horizontal communication when seeking accountability and attempting to eliminate corruption within the force. Also in accordance with the theories of Luther Gulick, the theories of Fayol show how within large organizations like police departments, specialization of tasks can lead to effectiveness. Therefore, the modern police department in many ways reflects old-school sociology and administrative theories in that at each rung of the hierarchy, an individual is assigned highly specific tasks and reports to specific individuals in positions of immediate authority. The hierarchy entails that individuals usually report to the person who is ranked immediately above them, similar to a military bureaucracy. The titles and ranks underscore the connections between the modern police department and military organizations. At the same time, police departments are trying to incorporate the more open systems of modern theorists. Based on effective business models, some administrative thought discounts the relevance of bureaucracy and hierarchy in favor of a more democratic operation. Police departments have yet to incorporate such democratic principles within their ranks but at the same time must allow for the inclusion of minorities and minority opinions on the force.